I’ve come to decide that expression for the sake of expression, in all fields, will always tend to be lacklustre no matter how beautifully executed it is. A filmmaker’s film, dancer’s dance, designer’s design—on the creator’s side, we forget how alienating it gets for a larger audience, mainly because we get caught up with feeling pleased with how well the form has been crafted.

Urgh, must remind myself: content, content, content. Am so guilty of this, I think. Gotta work and be harder on myself.

#edit: on another note, must really try curb my facebook girl-stalking habits. but some people are just so pretty with seemingly lovely and pretty lives while you know, meanwhile i’m sitting in the hovel that is my room contemplating my early morning commute to work tomorrow. the internet’s made for porn and general escapism.

Was flipping through an issue of d(x)i that I finally subscribed to and came across this interview with Jaime Hayon. Only after I finished reading the whole thing did I realize he was the featured artist on the very first issue of IDN that I bought years ago. Man, IDN…when I first discovered it, it opened up a whole new world to me. Was my first articulation of understanding the world of graphic design, I think. My feelings for the publication might have shifted somewhat by now, but you know, first loves and all.

Anyhow:

When it comes to creating an object, are there any differences between an artist and a designer?

Of course. The two start from different points. I see muself as an artist who works in the world of design. And that has certain implications. My creations bear the stamp of my personality. We could be talking about a new profession: the artist-designer. 

What would be the opposite be though? What would the perspective of the designer-artist be? Things that don’t bear the stamp of individual personality? In the strictest (and therefore hypothetical) sense, would a designer-designer always be function before form? I suppose I don’t mind that, although I worry that things would then veer towards the cold & dead.

My commute to work involves two bus rides, each lasting about forty minutes. The other morning,
I spent the entire stretch of the ride seriously considering where I could travel to next and logistics/ finances that it would entail. Perhaps the lesson in this is that one should not wear dresses with palm trees and sail boats to work, especially not in mid-week drudgery. Also no, said dress is not as ridiculous as it sounds.

The next time I travel, I want to have it solo. I used to be incredibly apprehensive about the idea because I was convinced that a terrible wave of loneliness would hit me if I came across something beautiful and had no one to share it with. As if the experience would not be as full or gratifying if
I didn’t see it mirrored by somebody else’s face. This isn’t so true, it seems. What tends to happen really, is some level of disappointment when you don’t see that mirrored image. It is mildly unsettling when someone sees a completely different take on something or worse, considers it wholly non-descript. Then you realize that what you felt was only ever truly yours alone.

Sometimes the smell of imminent rain in the night air can break my heart.

It’s the smell of beginnings, the prickle of the half-formed and beneath and through that, a current of want.

But I also want sun, I want light. I found it in mountains that smelt of water, coriander and cow shit, staring at the pockets of light that dripped from the ceiling the trees made. I felt the very edges of my being as sharply as the creases and shadows of the dried leaves on the ground and it felt good, this wholeness that emerges from solitude which I felt very true. It felt like in those quiet minutes staring into the blazing sun and asking/watching the clouds move, I had glanced into the real state of being: of aloneness and it’s like, once you really realize that, the surface and periphery of you, where you end and other things begin, your skin sings!

We’re wondering how come we still stick out like sore thumbs when we wander around the streets. True, we’re a ragtag bunch of 4 small Asian girls but that can’t be it really. We’ve spotted one or two other Asian backpackers who blended in rather well–is it because they are male? I think we lack the layer of grey dust that seasoned backpackers usually come with: our clothes still shine from our Singaporean washing machines, hair still relatively shiny. Gotta get the threadbare look soon, it’s really a different experience once you’re invisible.

On another note, it’s been absolutely fine being a female backpacker in India (so far). People are nicer to girls, and the women’s cabins in the Metro–that’s the Delhi MRT–are a freaking godsend. You know the shoving and pushing you see in Japanese subways? Yeah it can get that bad in the other cabins, so hello calmness and space of the women-only section. We were thinking about it a bit, about how back home, women fight for equality and to be able to be in the same places (and work positions) as men, but here we are enjoying the results of positive discrimination. I don’t think that’s the right phrase for it though. Whatever it is, I feel a little guilty at receiving this bit of privilage. Until of course, you come to the fact that the privilage is a result of the need for women to be safe from the bodily crush of men and the harrassment that may occur from that. Life would be better without gender, I think.

Hi, I’m in New Delhi. In a guesthouse in a crook of a backpacker’s den also known as Paharganj.

That’s what all the other online travellers’ stories warned me off though, it seemed as if it would reek of touristy-ness of the neon variety ala Bangkok’s Khao San. To be honest, it does reek but that would be the passing whiffs of cow dung (bovines spotted today: 14) and unidentifiable city juice.

Delhi is a grimy city.

I think I could/would romanticize the utter dereliction of the place, the cracked and stacked cubic rooftops (and it is quite a sight in the morning really), but it’s also hard to do that when you know that the people you’re walking by are living in the reality of such conditions and even worse. I’m starting to sound preachy.

But I suppose it’s that from this single day alone and being at the receiving end of the crowd’s pushiness and rushing, there’s an edge of desperation in the daily rhythm that I can’t quite dispel? Life can be pretty hard for a large number of people here I guess, so they’re not going to give you an inch, they will cut your queue, rush past you, do what it takes to be at the advantage. Aha, competitive– that’s the word. It’s a different nuance of kiasuness.

BUT, that is not to say that we haven’t already met some nice and/or interesting people. Armed with her trusty phrase book, Fang Zheng has already chatted up lots of people.  We popped by the Red Fort today, and people wanted to take photos of us (and possibly my still-red hair). And! There was this family who approached us, and the dad asked us where we were from etc, and asked whether we could give his daughter a coin from our country because she collects them.

Quite cute la, until after I gave her a dollar and her dad asked me “only one?” Excuse me, I am not an explosion of coins. Adults.

We also took a breather in the middle of a grassy patch where some locals were, played Monopoly Deal. Who knew even that would attract an audience?

We had a pre-dinner snack and meal on a rooftop cafe, was a good spot to conclude the day. The alleys are grimy as ever. but there were kids playing badminton in the rooftop just across, and spotted 3 small kites being flown somewhere. A kid tugging his dog, a man patting a passing cow.

In the process of exploring the topic of hair and the psyche, what I kept (and problematically) kept bringing into the loose Venn diagram that is my head was hair and it’s role for women as a symbol of what it means to be feminine. It became so female-oriented and focused on the male gaze that it became it started seeming as if my project was about gender identity and consequently,female sexuality. It took me a long while to distill and realize that my fuzzy hypothesis is NOT specifically hair = female sexuality but rather hair as an image within the female archetype and what it stands for in the subconscious. In this sense, this archetype is applicable and exists in the psychological landscape of both men and women.

“The archetypes lie deeper still within the formation and operation of the psyche…As a result, its profound influence on human affairs is almost totally unseen or acknowledged (Jung, 1973).”

“In brief, an archetype is the most symbolic, universal psychological image of a character type known to man. Although it can be observed in dreams in the form of mythological characters, it is seen most readily through an analysis of comparative world mythology, legends, fairy tales, religion, and the like. Te more that one examines the great diversity of world cultures, the more one finds that at a symbolic level there is an incredible, if not astounding, amount of agreement among various archetypal images (Neumann, 1954, 1963). The agreement is too profound to be produced by chance alone. It therefore is attributed to a similarity of psyche at the unconscious level. These similar appearing symbolic images are termed archetypes.”
Archetypal Social Systems Analysis: On the Deeper Structure of Human Systems (Ian I. Mitroff)

Which then right, can be cross-referenced to this bit here from Anthony Synnott’s Shame and Glory: A Sociology of Hair:

“…the appeal of long hair goes far back into western mythology, to the stories of Mary Magadalene, Rapunzel, Lorelei, and Lady Godiva.”

True that, Mr. Synnott. The confusion (or association) that keeps occurring in my thought stream as well as in the articles I’ve been trying to read is that long hair is a sex symbol in our society when actually, when you’ve dug through a variety of points of references, it’s really a much wider-encompassing entity. To say it is primarily linked to the sex impulse perhaps dilutes and misconstrues the symbol.

 

Chapter 3

Winston was dreaming of his mother.

He must, he thought, have been ten or eleven years old when his mother had disappeared. She was a tall, statuesque, rather silent woman with slow movements and magnificent fair hair. His father he remembered more vaguely as dark and thin, dressed always in neat dark clothes (Winston remembered especially the very thin soles of his father’s shows) and wearing spectacles. The two of them must evidently have been swallowed up in one of the first great purges of the ‘fifties.

At this moment his mother was sitting in some place deep down beneath him, with his young sister in her arms. He did not remember his sister at all, except as a tiny, feeble baby, always silent, with large, watchful eyes. Both of them were looking up at him. They were down in some subterranean place – the bottom of a well, for instance, or a very deep grave – but it was a place which, already far below him, was itself moving downwards. They were in the saloon of a sinking ship, looking up at him through the darkening water. There was still air in the saloon, they could still see him and he them, but all the while they were sinking down, down into the green waters which in another moment must hide them from sight for ever. He was out in the light and air while they were being sucked down to death, and they were down there because he was up here. He knew it and they knew it, and he could see the knowledge in their faces. There was no reproach in their faces or in their hearts, only the knowledge that they must die in order that he might remain alive, and that this was part of the unavoidable order of things.

He could not remember what had happened, but he knew in his dream that in some way the lives of his mother and his sister had been sacrificed to his own. It was one of those dreams which, while retaining the characteristic dream scenery, are a continuation of one’s intellectual life, and in which one becomes aware of facts and ideas which still seem new and valuable after one is awake. The thing that now suddenly struck Winston was that his mother’s death, nearly thirty years ago, had been tragic and sorrowful in a way that was no longer possible. Tragedy, he perceived, belonged to an ancient time, to a time where there was still privacy, love and friendship, and when the members of a family stood by one another without needing to know the reason, His mother;s memory tore at his heart because he had died loving him, when he was too young and selfish to love her in return, and because somehow, he did not remember how, she had sacrificed herself to a conception of loyalty that was private and unalterable. SUch things, he saw, could not happen today. Today there fear, hatred and pain, but no dignity of emotion, no deep and complex sorrows. All this he seemed to see in the large eyes of his mother and his sister, looking up at him through the green water, hundreds of fathoms down and still sinking.

Suddenly he was standing on short springy turf, on a summer evening when the slanting rays of the sun gilded the ground. The landscape that he was looking at recurred so often in his dreams that he was never fully certain whether or not he had seen it in the real world. In his waking thoughts he called it the Golden Country. It was an old, rabbit-bitten pasture, with a foot-track wandering across it and a molehill here and there. In the ragged hedge on the opposite side of the field the boughs of the elm trees were swaying very faintly in the breeze, their leaves just stirring in dense masses like women’s hair. Somewhere near at hand, though out of sight, there was a clear, slow-moving stream where dace were swimming in the pools under the willow trees.

The girl with dark hair was coming towards him across the field. With what seemed a single movement she tore of her clothes and flung them disdainfully aside. Here body was white and smooth, but it aroused no desire in him, indeed he barely looked at it. What overwhelmed him in that instant was admiration of the gesture with which she had thrown her clothes aside. With its grace and carelessness it seemed to annihilate a whole culture, a whole system of thought, as though Big Brother and the Party and the Thought police could all be swept into nothingness by a splendid movement of the arm. That too was a gesture belonging to the ancient time. Winston woke up with the word ‘Shakespeare’ on his lips.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.